Comments on: CA single- and multi-family housing starts http://firsttuesdayjournal.com/ca-single-and-multi-family-housing-starts/ Tue, 22 May 2012 11:15:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Building Code For New Homes « Business Enriched Network http://firsttuesdayjournal.com/ca-single-and-multi-family-housing-starts/comment-page-1/#comment-110057 Building Code For New Homes « Business Enriched Network Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:06:48 +0000 http://blog.firsttuesdayjournal.com/?p=1070#comment-110057 [...] first tuesday take: It may be awhile before the newly-mandated fire sprinklers will be of use to anyone — the number of SFRs and apartment/condo construction starts from December 2010 to January 2011 dropped more than 40%. For SFRs, that is the most dramatic decrease since before the Great Recession. This dearth of new home construction reflects the lack of money in the system available to builders, which in turn is representative of a lack of housing demand. [For more information on construction starts, see the February 2011 first tuesday article, CA single- and multi-family housing starts.] [...]

[...] first tuesday take: It may be awhile before the newly-mandated fire sprinklers will be of use to anyone — the number of SFRs and apartment/condo construction starts from December 2010 to January 2011 dropped more than 40%. For SFRs, that is the most dramatic decrease since before the Great Recession. This dearth of new home construction reflects the lack of money in the system available to builders, which in turn is representative of a lack of housing demand. [For more information on construction starts, see the February 2011 first tuesday article, CA single- and multi-family housing starts.] [...]

]]> By: David K. Beno http://firsttuesdayjournal.com/ca-single-and-multi-family-housing-starts/comment-page-1/#comment-105739 David K. Beno Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:30:15 +0000 http://blog.firsttuesdayjournal.com/?p=1070#comment-105739 If there are 1,100,000 vacant units today and population is growing by 427,000 per year then there could be a housing crises in four to five years. Why? Because we need about 130,000 dwelling units for population growth and maybe 30,000 units lost due to age and other factors each year. We are produceing less than 60,000 per year now. At best there are probably over 500,000 vacant dwelling units at any one time due to people moving, renovations, etc. This means that once the surplus vacant units are used up there will be demand for at least 100,000 dwelling units per year more than are being produced today. If there are 1,100,000 vacant units today and population is growing by 427,000 per year then there could be a housing crises in four to five years. Why? Because we need about 130,000 dwelling units for population growth and maybe 30,000 units lost due to age and other factors each year. We are produceing less than 60,000 per year now. At best there are probably over 500,000 vacant dwelling units at any one time due to people moving, renovations, etc. This means that once the surplus vacant units are used up there will be demand for at least 100,000 dwelling units per year more than are being produced today.

]]> By: carlye cordner http://firsttuesdayjournal.com/ca-single-and-multi-family-housing-starts/comment-page-1/#comment-57639 carlye cordner Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:28:00 +0000 http://blog.firsttuesdayjournal.com/?p=1070#comment-57639 No forecast for 2010? Why forecast SFR starts for 2009 in an article dated 1/6/2010 - isn't this historical information? <em><strong>This comment refers to an old or outdated version of this Market Chart. Please keep in mind that all Housing Start data is posted with a one-month reporting lag (thus, the information posted at the beginning of January 2010 only extended to the end of November, 2009). No forecast for 2010? Why forecast SFR starts for 2009 in an article dated 1/6/2010 – isn’t this historical information?
This comment refers to an old or outdated version of this Market Chart. Please keep in mind that all Housing Start data is posted with a one-month reporting lag (thus, the information posted at the beginning of January 2010 only extended to the end of November, 2009).

]]>