October 2010 RCDs
loading...
loading...
End of free preview
The rest of this content is only available to first tuesday Members. If you are a current first tuesday Member, please login above.
Not a current Member? For only $29.50, our Annual Membership includes access to:
- the first tuesday journal;
- over 350 first tuesday real estate forms;
- over 35 FARM letters; and
- a 16-book reference library and more!
To sign up, visit firsttuesday.us!
loading...
loading...
About The Author
ft Editorial Staff
is the writing staff comprised of legal editor Fred Crane, In-House Broker Consultant Fernando Nunez and writer-editors Connor P. Wallmark, Giang Hoang-Burdette, Jeffery Marino, Carrie B. Reyes, Sarah Cantino, Matthew Taylor and Matthew Shade.
Leave a Reply
-
![iStock_000006162498Medium1[1]](http://firsttuesdayjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/iStock_000006162498Medium11-106x75.jpg)
Landlord not liable for tenant’s lost business during renovations
-
Apartment owner’s opposition to tenant’s child care business is not retaliatory action
-
Occupancy by sole owner of an EP entity does not avoid HESCA
-
Alternative arbitration provision in lease agreement unenforceable by property owner when third party is involved
-
City’s cancellation of development agreement is not justified by city’s unexpected interference
Is there any specific division of legal matters for just commercial or industrial real estate? I would love to have that information handy for my reference. Thanks
Dave Baker
INCO Commercial Realty
949.313.2303
loading...
The more significant part of the hotel parking tax case was her attempt to make it a class-action got turned down.
Court ruled that no class actions are permitted for challenging the city tax. So the $7.70 tax has to be challenged by each tax-payer individually.
Perhaps a better strategy would have been for her to file in Federal Court alleging a burden on interstate commerce and sought class action there.
loading...