Enter search phrases between quote marks.
Example: "trust deed"

Entries    Comments      

Copyright © 2011 by the first tuesday Journal Online - firsttuesdayjournal.com;
P.O. Box 20069, Riverside, CA 92516

Readers are encouraged to reproduce and/or distribute this article.

Readers do not have to request permission to reprint items, however all reprinted items must bear the following attribution: Reprinted from the first tuesday Journal Online — firsttuesdayjournal.com P.O. Box 20069, Riverside, CA 92516

September 2009 RCD

By • Sep 1st, 2009 • Category: Recent Case Decisions, September 2009 Journal

GD Star Rating
loading...
GD Star Rating
loading...

Property Management

Employee of tenant is immune from eviction as beneficiary under lease

Reported by Bradley Markano

An occupant’s rent was paid by his employer under a lease agreement entered into solely by the employer and the landlord, naming the employer as the tenant on the lease. The occupant’s employment was later terminated, and the employer informed the occupant and landlord that rent would no longer be paid. Upon a request from the employer, the landlord entered without the occupant’s permission, changing the locks and forcing the occupant to vacate the premises. No notice was served on the occupant, and no unlawful detainer (UD) action was filed. The occupant sought to recover his money loss from the forced eviction, claiming the landlord was liable for self-help and forcible entry since the occupant was protected as the intended beneficiary under the lease. The landlord claimed he had acted properly since the occupant was not named as a tenant on the lease and his status as an employee of the tenant had been terminated. A California appeals court held the occupant was entitled to recover his money loss from the eviction since the occupant possessed the property under a lease agreement which had not been terminated, and the landlord’s attempt to oust the occupant by entering against his will and changing the locks on the employer’s breach of the lease was both forcible entry and self-help. [Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood Apartments (March 4, 2009)___CA4th__]

GD Star Rating
loading...
GD Star Rating
loading...
There are currently no comments highlighted. - ft

Copyright © 2011 by the first tuesday Journal Online - firsttuesdayjournal.com;
P.O. Box 20069, Riverside, CA 92516

Readers are encouraged to reproduce and/or distribute this article.

Copyright © 2011 by first tuesday Realty Publications, Inc. Readers are encouraged to reprint or distribute this information with credit given to the first tuesday Journal Online — P.O. Box 20069, Riverside, CA 92516.

Tagged as: , , , , ,

is a licensed real estate agent, holds an English degree from the University of Redlands and handles first tuesday's Market Charts.
Email this author | All posts by

One Response »

  1. What a tremendous value this periodic update from First Tuesday is..

    I love it…

    …even though I am a 30 year vet…

    Send me a link and I will put it on my website.

    jack barry, SF..

    ps: My two distinctions, from most: I don’t practice Dual Agency..(see my website,)….and I always charge a heckuva lot less thant the usual broker… (from hourly fee to 2% max.)

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

first tuesday encourages your comments.